Research
AC3R Research Themes
21st-century risks
Analyzing new threats - from financial contagion to climate crises to pandemics: This theme aims to develop new approaches to conduct modern risk evaluation, responding to the pervasive uncertainty surrounding 21st-century global crises. Modern risks associated with financial-economic instability, environmental changes, technological breakdowns and epidemic outbreaks are characterized by their contagious amplification over time and space, i.e., across markets, regions, and networks. This theme provides new probabilistic, statistical and econometrics methods to fundamentally advance the modeling and measurement of modern shocks and fragilities, with a focus on financial-economic (in)stability.
Social-economic resilience
Understanding how systems recover and adapt: This theme aims to improve our understanding of what makes financial institutions, firms, households and societies resilient to 21st-century risks. The degree of adaptability and innovativeness of human capital along with an equitable allocation of resources and services are suggested as key drivers of resilience, but our understanding of the precise mechanisms is in its infancy. This theme provides modern analyses to bear on the drivers of resilience and adequate measures that enhance socio-economic stability.
Regulation and policy
Designing legal structures to make risks manageable: This theme aims to unravel the modern interplay between the tools of regulators and policymakers, including financial regulation, monetary policy and investment incentives in securing financial-economic stability. It also analyzes the role of financial institutions, and in particular insurers and pension funds, in providing long-term capital and investment commitment.
AC3R Selected Research Articles
Achieving safety: Personal, private, and public provision
Enrico C. Perotti and Spyros Terovitis
We study how a primary need for minimum safety affects investment choices. In addition to risky projects, agents may choose to invest in personal assets they can control. Investing in personal assets serves as self-insurance, as they ensure a higher minimum return but offer a lower expected return than the risky project offers. In autarky, investors ensure a minimum return by personal assets, besides investing in the risky project. Private intermediaries and a safe rate arise endogenously to limit inefficient self-insurance, with self-insured investors holding bank equity to safeguard private safe debt. The endogenous conflict over interim risk choices is resolved by demandable debt, forcing early liquidation in states in which the ability of banks to repay debt holders remains uncertain. Our work highlights the unintended consequences of public provision of safety for private provision of safety and aggregate investment, demonstrating that these effects depend critically on whether public provision takes the form of public debt or deposit insurance.
Saddlepoint approximations for Hawkes jump-diffusion processes with an application to risk management
Yacine Aït-Sahalia and Roger J. A. Laeven
We propose a statistical model based on Hawkes processes in which large financial losses can arise in close succession serially as well as cross-sectionally. We derive in closed form saddlepoint approximations to the tails of profit and loss distributions, both marginal and joint, and use them to construct explicit risk measure formulae that account for the fact that a given financial institution’s losses make it more likely that that institution will experience further losses, and that other financial institutions will experience losses as well. These closed-form risk measures can be used for comparative statics, parameter calibration, and setting capital requirements and potential systemic risk charges.